Digital disruption: Lessons of 9.11
	  
	
  
  
	
	© lloyds.com Limited 2002
  
  Tuesday, 4th of March 2002 - September 11 highlighted 
	just how dependent global enterprises are on interlinked telecoms systems. 
	But the effect of business interruption in this area can be reduced with comprehensive 
	disaster recovery planning - and the right kind of insurance.
  
 Digital exclusions
   The internet and new communications technology enable companies to operate 
	more efficiently, but they also raise customers’ expectations about service 
	standards. Long delays may hit a firm's finances hard, yet many businesses 
	are unaware digital risk exposure is largely no longer covered by standard 
	insurance policies like business interruption. 
   Business interruption insurance compensates for lost income if a company 
	has to vacate its premises due to disaster-related damage. Most coverage comes 
	as part of a firm's corporate property insurance. Policies cover the profits 
	a company would have earned, based on its financial records, had the disaster 
	not occurred. 
   However, from January 2002, reinsurance companies around the world excluded 
	data and other digital liabilities from their cover, along with terrorism. 
	This followed warnings made in 2001. 
   DK Matai, chairman and CEO of UK-based mi2g, a digital communications 
	specialist, says: "Substantial take-up of digital 
	risk insurance is expected in 2002 and beyond as the new digital exclusions 
	and their ramifications become better understood by insurance buyers and sellers."
   Eliminating dependencies
   After the terrorist attacks, many businesses that did not suffer physical 
	damage were temporarily unable to function because of systems failures. 
   Ultimately, it is up to a company's broker, disaster planner or risk manager 
	to help limit the period of loss after a catastrophe. Some loss adjusters 
	believe the terrorist attacks prompted contingency plans to be revisited with 
	an evaluation of all a firm's dependencies – although one Lloyd's underwriter 
	says it has been difficult to assess the business losses of telecoms firms. 
  
   J Pat Guerry, marketing and strategy vice president of US loss adjuster 
	Crawford & Co, says: "Disaster recovery and the associated planning is about 
	having alternative means of operating. 
   "Whether this is having access to corporate data (remote hot sites), communications 
	(back-up call centres), or personnel (contingent chain of commands), an effective 
	disaster plan need not focus on the cause of the loss, but rather on the loss 
	itself. 
   "In other words, planners should not ask, 'What if a terrorist attacks?' 
	but rather 'What if our communications are disrupted?' Elimination of dependencies 
	is the key to getting results from the planning process," he comments. 
   Re-routing facilities 
   Before September 11, many companies failed to factor telecoms convergence 
	issues into their business continuity plans. According to UK based-continuity 
	specialist, Global Continuity, telecoms and IT were once considered separate 
	networks, but they are interlinked and 'mission critical' – vital for operation.
   The wide scale telecoms outage after the attacks was due to the destruction 
	of crucial telecoms infrastructure and transmitters and the swamping of global 
	systems because of the sheer volume of calls being made. 
   Communications outages exacerbated difficulties in organising recovery teams 
	and accounting for staff. And recovery processes that relied on transferring 
	data through telecoms networks were delayed – by many days in some cases. 
  
   Guerry says: "Some new technologies, such as call re-routing, and cellular 
	usage, greatly reduced the impact on business loss, particularly relating 
	to a company being able to communicate with its customers. Firms that do not 
	have such capabilities in their contingency plans should consider communication 
	as a top priority." 
   Local networks 
   Communications in general were problematic after September 11, according 
	to surveys by business analysts McKinsey, Gartner and Deloitte & Touche. The 
	terrorist attacks caused major continuity difficulties for internet-reliant 
	companies. Those directly affected by telecoms outages had 'dead' websites 
	for days, causing major losses for e-commerce-related businesses in Manhattan. 
  
   But other companies elsewhere suffered temporary internet service outage, 
	too. Analysts found this was because people reading about the attacks caused 
	a massive surge in internet use worldwide, which overloaded servers and routers. 
  
   Most firms recovered major data and critical business systems. But Global 
	Continuity says many overlooked the importance of local connectivity - such 
	as desktops and local area networks - to ongoing operations. 
   Continuous availability 
   Internet availability is important for many businesses - not just e-commerce 
	ventures. It is one of several means of providing services, so continuous 
	availability of a connection is vital, as is adequate insurance for the technical 
	infrastructure. 
   "Needing main servers for electronic communication is a new concern," comments 
	Guerry. "Once again, re-routing capabilities are crucial and need to be part 
	of disaster planning. It is important that corporations develop offsite capabilities, 
	much as insurers spread their risk." 
   Since the attacks, businesses that rely on the internet for e-commerce sales 
	- or for other mission critical activities - are looking to implement solutions 
	such as re-routing. But for the most vulnerable websites, a back-up website 
	in a different region or continent may be a viable solution as traffic can 
	be diverted after a disaster. 
   Future technology
   Will future technological advances in telecoms increase the potential for 
	business interruption? "It is hard to tell," says Guerry. "Advances such as 
	satellite communications are likely to decrease the potential for interruption 
	of communications. However, a dependency on any such system will increase 
	a company's potential exposure." 
   The magnitude of the attacks on the twin towers demonstrated that the physical 
	loss of facilities may be the most commonly recognised issue that businesses 
	deal with after an event, but the real impact of a catastrophe on a business 
	is based on the unique ways it operates. 
   According to a report by Global Continuity entitled Business continuity: 
	Lessons learnt from September 11, telecommuting - working from home – may 
	be a viable way of spreading dependencies as a preventative measure or solution 
	in the event of a catastrophe. 
   Underwriters are still calculating the cost of business interruption claims 
	from the US attacks and disaster planners will continue to learn from this 
	event for many months. 
   Some 25% of insurers that responded to a recent Tillinghast-Towers Perrin 
	survey on technology investments said technology has played - or will play 
	- a major role in managing the impact of the attacks on business or process 
	operations. Ensuring there are appropriate levels of the right insurance for 
	clients will be just one challenging aspect of future business continuity 
	planning. 
   ______________________________________________________________________________________
   To comment on this or other articles please contact lloyd's.com 
	at comments@lloyds.com.